• Audrey Schlegel


Nowadays, inter-state relations are well organized, and even present some similarities to human relations. This realization has led to the elaboration of the concept of ‘societies of states’, to describe how states with similar interests and values come to elaborate common rules to which they accept to submit themselves. Some of these societies have been institutionalized: the United Nations Organization, the North-Atlantic Treaty Organization, the European Union, the Council of Europe etc. Georgia as a relatively new state has deployed considerable efforts to join some of these societies, notably the EU. However, the success of such endeavours does not depend only upon the efforts of the candidate state: it also depends upon the willingness of the older member states of these societies to accept a new member. This article is aiming at measuring this willingness on the side of the EU member states, in relation to Georgia’s integration efforts. It also tries to expose the mechanisms beyond the EU’s requests for changes to Georgia, requests presented as accession conditions.


1. BULL H., The Anarchical Society, 2nd ed., University of Columbia Press, 1977.

2. CADIER D. „Is the European Neighborhood Policy a substitute for enlargement?“ in IDEAS Report The Crisis of EU Enlargement, LSE, 2013.

3. CHASE A., „ Introduction: Human Rights and Agency in the Arab World“, in A. CHASE, A. HAMZAWY (eds.), Human Rights in the Arab World: Independent Voices, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006, pp. 1- 20.

4. COMBS J. A., The Jay Treaty: Political Battleground of the Founding Fathers, University of California Press, 1970.

5. CORNELL S., Small Nations and Great Powers: A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflicts in the Caucasus, Routledge, 2005.

6. ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH CENTER, Focus on Armenia: Eurasian Customs Union Crawling Closer to Georgia, December 2014.

7. ENGBERG K., The EU Military Operations: A Comparative Analysis, Routledge, 2013.

8. European Ideas Network, Think Tank Cooperation 2006, TF4 European Governance and Democracy.

9. FEATHERSON K., „The Maastricht Roots of the Eurocrsis“ in European Social Journal, on the 14th March 2012.

10. FERGUSON Y. H., „Hedley Bull’s The Anarchical Society revisited: States or Polities in Global Politics“, in B. A Robertson (ed.), International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory, A&C Black, 2002, pp. 184-208.

11. FIROOZ-ABADI D., „Iran and the ideal international system“ in A. ETHASHAMI, R. MOLAVI (eds.), Iran and the International System, Routledge 2012, pp. 43-58.

12. FRANSEN F. J., The Supranational Politics of Jean Monnet, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001.

13. FRATIANNI M., „EU Enlargement and Flexible Integration“ in M. CAMPANELLA, S. J. W. EIJIFFINGER (eds.), EU Economic Governance and Globalization, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003, pp. 7-26.

14. GULMEZ D. B., GULMEZ S. B., „Theorizing the EU’s global authority: an alternative trichotomy“ in A. BOENING, J.-F. KREMER, A. VAN LOON (eds.), Global Power Europe, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Institutionnal Approaches to the EU’s External Relations, Springer, 2013, pp. 111-126.

15. HUFNAGEL S., Policing Cooperation Across Borders, Ashgate Publishing, 2013.

16. KELEMEN R. D., SCHMIDT S. K., „Introduction: The ECJ and legal integraton: permanent momentum?“ in S. K. SCHIMDT (ed.), The Power of the ECJ, Routledge, 2013, pp.1-7.

17. KISSINGER H., World Order, Penguin Press, 2014.

18. KLEIN M., „Die Beziehungen der EU zum Kaukasus: neue Dynamik ohne klare Strategie“ in E. BOS, J. DIERINGER (dirs.), Genese einer EU der 27- Die EU nach der Osterweiterung, 2008, pp. 331-350.

19. LIEBSCHER K., CHRISTL J., LOOSLECHNER P., RITZBERGER-GRÜNWALD D., Financial Development, Integration and Stability, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2006.

20. LINDSETH P. L., Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State, Oxford University Press, 2010.

21. MARTINSEN D. S., WESSEL A. U., „On the Path to Differenciation: upward transfer, logic of variation and sub- optimality in EU social policy“ in Journal of European Public Policy, 2014, pp. 1255-1272.

22. MORSINK J., The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999.

23. MUGUERZA J., „The Alternative of Dissent“ in G. B. PETERSON (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 73-130.

24. MÜNCKLER H., Mitte und Maß, Rororo Verlag, 2012.

25. NDAKAVUKA SCHEFER K., Social Regulations in the WTO: Trade Policy and International Legal Develpment, Edward Elgar Publishing House, 2003-

26. PANKE D., Unequal Actors in Equalizing Institutions, Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.

27. RETTMAN A., „EU-Georgia Treaty highlights enlargement fatigue“, on EU Observer, 8th July 2013.

28. SCHILTZ Ch. B., Interview with Commissioner Füle: „Ukraine, Moldau und Georgien müssen in die EU“ on Die Welt, 30th May 2014.

29. SCHNEIDER C. J., Conflict, Negotiations and EU Enlargement, Cambridge University Press, 2009.

30. SCHULT Ch., NEUKIRCH R., „Gescheitertes Assoziierungsabkommen: EU-Verhandler geben Bundesregierung Mitschuld an Ukraine-Krise“ on Spiegel Online, 26th November 2014.

31. SHAW M., Global Society and International Relations, Oxford University Press, 2000.

32. SICURELLA R., „Some Reflexions for a General Theory“ in A. KLIP (ed.), Substantive Criminal law of the EU, Makklu, 2011, pp. 233-250.

33. SIMON J., KEY S., „NATO: European Security and Beyond?“, in R. TIERSKY (ed.), Europe Today: National Politics, European Integration and European Security, pp. 89-118.

34. STIKKER D. U., „The Functionnal Approach to European Integration“ in Foreign Affairs, April 1951.

35. TOCCI N., The EU and Conflict Resolution: Promoting Peace in the Backyard, Routledge, 2007.

36. TSIKHISTAVI-KHUTSISHVILI N., Chair of the ICCN board in „Civil Society In EAP Countries In 2015: What To Expect?- Expert Forecasts For Civil Society 2015“, on Civil Society-Dialogue for Progress, 17th December 2014.

37. VAN ELSUWEGE P., From Soviet Republics to Member States: A Legal and Political Assessment of the Baltic States’ Accession to the EU, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.

38. VAN OUDENAREN J., Uniting Europe: an Introduction to the EU, Rowman and Littlfield, 2005.

39. VON ONDARZA N., „Strenghtening the Core or Splitting Europe?“, SWP Research Paper, March 2013.

40. WILLIAMS A., The Ethos of Justice: Values, Law and Justice, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

41. YAGER L., SIROIS E., PFEIFFER N., WTO- Early Decisions are Vital in Ongoing Negotiations, Diane Publishing, 2002.