Evaluation Criteria

 

THE REVIEW OF THE ARTICLE FOR THE GEORGIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL
                                                                                 Year/Month/Date

Title of the article:
Date of submission of the article:

  I.Evaluation Criteria          

1

Appropriateness for this Journal

 

 

 

 

 

2

Significance and TimelyTopic

 

 

 

 

 

3

Adequacy of Literature Review/Theoretical Grounding

 

 

 

 

 

4

Logic and Argumentation

 

 

 

 

 

5

Proper Interpretations and Clarity of the text

 

 

 

 

 

6

Proper Conclusions

 

 

 

 

 

7

Contributiontothe Field

 

 

 

 

 

8

Organization / Structure

 

 

 

 

 

9

Writing and Citing Style

 

 

 

 

 
II.Reviewer Comments

 

1.  Does this article provide
compelling foundations and literature review?

(Please include any observations and
recommendations as to how the
author(s) can improve this specific
topic)

2.   Are there anytopics or
information related to the discussion which appears to
be missing or seem poorly
developed?

(Please list them and suggest what
topic(s) or information the author(s)
should include or elaborate to enrich
the article.)

3.  Is the article well written (text structure and proper English),well organized and logical, and is it simple and
accessible for the reader?

(Please comment on the clarity of
this text.)

4.  Is the Interpretation logical?

(Please include any observations and recommendations as to how the
author(s) can improve the interpretation)

5.  Is the presented findings and
conclusions properly developed in the discussion?

(Please comment on the scientific
discussion of the article)

6.  Is the title, abstract and
conclusion appropriate?

 

(Please opine on the effectiveness
of the organization and flow of the
chapter)

III. Comments to the Author(s)

Please provide your constructive comments to the author(s) for improving and revising the article.
- Please

- Please
-  Please

IV. Comments to the Editor

Please provide comments or suggestions to the editor regarding your decision concerning this article. Please be specific as to whether or not you think this article is publishable. (Note that these comments will NOT be shared with the authors).

............................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................. 

V. Reviewer Decisions

Please place an indicative check mark in the options that suit your final decision.

Accept (Publishable Now)

 

Accept (Minor Revisions Needed)

 

Accept (Major Revisions Needed)

 

Reject (Major Revisions Needed)

 

Reject (The article is not scientific)

 

The article is not recommended to be published in GEORGIAN PSYCHOLOGICAL JOURNAL 

  

 (Reviewer’s name, last name, signature)

(Academic degree)

(Institution of employment)

(Position)

(Tel./fax.)

(Email)

*informationon the reviewer is confidentialand shall not be disclosed to the author of the reviewed article.

**the completed form should be submitted to the Journal Editorial Board by email:
gpj@tsu.ge